Format: Kindle Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf. Ich liebe die Geschichte, die Charakters und das Ende. Alles stimmt bei diesem Roman. Ich werde mir die anderen Teile auch kaufen. Rezension anzeigen. Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon. BA ND Reading is my super power. I make the world disappear! This book was a fairly decent story. A bit out of the ordinary and no cliff hanger which is always a plus.
Not sure what to make of that except to say it put a damper on me searching for other books because I feel a bit of a let down with that type of maneuver. I have carried out further research and realize that the maneuvering has continued throughout both series so I will not purchase any more books by this author.
Thank you. This is a clean romance with a light Christian thread. I was surprised to find out that this book the entire series actually was previously released as a secular romance containing adult material. It does however explain some of the formatting glitches. In several places spaces between words are missing.
Also there is no warning for time, place or point of view changes. An extra line between paragraphs with or without a decorative symbol between, helps the mind subconsciously anticipate a change. I found the flow repeatedly interrupted as I readjusted to the who, when and where of a sudden change. It's not confusing or hard to follow and it doesn't effect the storyline. But the catching up moment does effect the reading experience.
The storyline is interesting and has constant movement to keep your attention.
HER UNWANTED PROTECTOR by Ivy James - Read Online
The characters are well drawn and conversation flows naturally. Faith is shown through life choices and habits. The reader is not preached at. I loved the attitude of the female protagonist. Blind at age fourteen she pushed to be able to do anything and everything she could and many things people thought she couldn't.
Her attitude reminds me of my friend Jessica Cox who was born without arms yet holds a third degree black belt in ti-Kwan-do and is the only person without arms to ever get a pilot's license. I enjoyed the book and will add it to my reread collection. In other words, it was by no means an exclusive right of the knight to wear and fight in armor.
Foot soldiers such as mercenaries, or groups of retainers comprising peasants, as well as burghers, also participated in armed conflict and accordingly protected themselves with armor of varying quality and extent. Indeed, the burghers of a certain age, and above a stipulated wealth or income of most medieval and Renaissance cities were expected—an expectation often enforced by laws and decrees—to acquire and keep their own arms and armor. Usually this would not be a complete suit of armor, but comprised at least a helmet, a body defense in the form of a mail shirt In times of war, these militia forces were required to defend the city or do military service for feudal lords or allied cities.
- The One Dollar Horse: Book 1.
- When Twenty-Six Thousand Stinkbugs Invade Your Home?
- Heart Pentacle Filet Crochet Wall Hanging Pattern.
During the fifteenth century, as some wealthy and powerful cities became more independent and confident, even burghers organized their own tournaments for which, of course, they would have worn armor. Accordingly, not every piece of armor was once worn by a knight, nor can every person depicted in an artwork wearing armor be identified as a knight.
- Through The Valley?
- 2014 Magnificat Lenten Companion.
- 36 Succulent Chicken Breast Recipes From Around The World.
A person in armor should more correctly be referred to as a man-at-arms or man in armor. There are several references to women participating in armed conflict from most periods of history. Nevertheless, some are recorded as having fought in armor, although no contemporary illustrations showing any of them actually wearing armor appear to have survived. Joan of Arc ca. Yet only one small illustration of her, undoubtedly drawn during her lifetime, has come down to us, showing her with a sword and banner but not dressed in armor.
The fact that contemporaries apparently perceived women leading an army, or even wearing armor, as something worth recording at least in writing indicates that such a sight must have been an exception rather than the rule. This idea may stem from the fact that much of the armor on exhibition in institutions like the Metropolitan Museum represents equipment of especially high quality, while much of the plainer arms and armor of the common man and lower nobility has been either relegated to storerooms or lost over the centuries.
It is true that, unless looted from a battlefield or won in a tournament, the acquisition of armor would have been a costly affair. However, as there are certainly differences in the quality of armor, there also would have been differences in price. Armor of low to medium quality, affordable to burghers, mercenaries, and lower nobility, could be bought, ready-made, at markets, trading fairs, and in urban shops. On the other hand, there were also the high-end, made-to-measure products of the imperial or royal court workshops, and of famous German and Italian armorers.
Although examples of the price of armor, weapons, and equipment are known from several periods in history, it is difficult to translate historical monetary value into modern terms. At the upper end of the scale, we find examples such as a large garniture a basic suit of armor that, through the addition of further pieces and plates, could be adapted for various purposes both on the battlefield and in different types of tournament commissioned in by a German king later emperor for his son. An entire suit of field armor that is, armor for battle usually weighs between 45 and 55 lbs.
Moreover, while most modern equipment is chiefly suspended from the shoulders or waist, the weight of a well-fitted armor is distributed all over the body. It was not until the seventeenth century that the weight of field armor was greatly increased in order to render it bulletproof against ever more accurate firearms. At the same time, however, full armor became increasingly rare, and only vital parts of the body, such as the head, torso, and hands, remained protected by metal plate.
A harness of plate armor was made up of individual elements for each limb. The widely held view that a man in armor could hardly move, and, once he had fallen to the ground, was unable to rise again, is also without foundation. On the contrary, historical sources tell us of the famous French knight Jean de Maingre ca. Furthermore, there are several illustrations from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance depicting men-at-arms, squires, or knights, all in full armor, mounting horses without help or instruments such as ladders or cranes. Modern experiments with genuine fifteenth- and sixteenth-century armor as well as with accurate copies have shown that even an untrained man in a properly fitted armor can mount and dismount a horse, sit or lie on the ground, get up again, run, and generally move his limbs freely and without discomfort.
Tournament armor was made for very specific occasions and would have been worn only for limited periods of time. The man-at-arms would have mounted his steed with the aid of his squire or a small step, and the last pieces of his armor could then be donned after securely sitting in the saddle. This notion appears to have originated during the late nineteenth century as a joke. It entered popular fiction during the following decades, and the image was finally immortalized in when Sir Laurence Olivier used it in his movie Henry V —despite the protestations of his historical advisors, who included the eminent authority Sir James Mann, Master of the Armouries at HM Tower of London.
As outlined above, most armor is neither so heavy nor inflexible as to immobilize the wearer. Most men-at-arms would have been able to simply put one foot in a stirrup and mount their horse without assistance. A stool or perhaps the help of a squire would have made the process even speedier; a crane, however, was absolutely unnecessary.
What is Kobo Super Points?
When the person wearing armor was not engaged in warfare, he would simply do what people do today. Being on the battlefield must have been a different matter. In this case, we do not know the answer. It is sometimes argued that the military salute originated during the Roman Republic , when assassinations were common and citizens were required to approach public officials with their right hand raised in order to show that they did not conceal a weapon.
A more common account is that the modern military salute originated from men in armor raising the visors of their helmets before greeting their lord or comrades. This gesture would have made a person both recognizable as well as vulnerable, at the same time demonstrating that the right hand i.
Although these theories are compelling and romantic , there is actually little evidence to support either of them as the direct origin of the modern military salute. As for the Roman practice, it would be virtually impossible to prove that it continued through fifteen centuries or was revived during the Renaissance , leading in a straight line to the modern military salute.
There is also no direct evidence for the visor theory, although it is more recent.
Supreme Court of Virginia Opinions
The majority of helmets for war after around were increasingly of types not fitted with visors, and helmets became rare on European battlefields after about As with so many misconceptions, the origins of this misnomer are to be found in the nineteenth century. When early scholars of armor looked at medieval artworks, they noticed what they thought to be depictions of many different forms of armor: rings, chains, bands of rings, scales, small plates, etc.
It is today commonly accepted, however, that most of these different depictions are actually various attempts by artists to efficiently show the surface of a type of armor that is difficult to render both in paint or sculpture. Rather than showing each interlinking ring, the small links were stylized by dots, slashes, S-shapes, circles, and the like, which readily lent themselves to misinterpretation. First, hardly any evidence survives that would provide a complete picture for any given period. Scarce evidence is available from the fifteenth century onward as to how armor was ordered, in what time the order was completed, and how much the parts or entire armor cost.
Second, a complete armor could comprise elements made by several specialized armorers. Pieces might also be held in stock half-finished and then fitted for a specific commission. Finally, the matter is complicated by regional and national differences. Throughout the German-speaking lands, most armorer workshops were controlled by strict guild regulations , which limited the number of apprentices, and thus had a direct effect on the number of pieces that could be produced by one master and his small workshop.
In Italy, on the other hand, no such regulations existed, and workshops could accordingly be much larger, which undoubtedly must have enhanced speed and quantity of production. The Perfect Hostage. Badd to the Bone. Dead Giveaway. Covert Games. Back To You. Kimberly Kincaid. No Perfect Man. DD Lorenzo.
Her Cowboy Prince. Trish Milburn. Heather Slade. A Rancher's Heart. Vivian Arend. Hunt for Evil. Amy Jarecki. Wind River Wrangler. Lindsay McKenna.
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
Fear the Storm. Geri Foster. Melissa Foster. Counter To My Intelligence. Mylomon: Warlord Brides. Nancey Cummings. Sharon C. Sex and Lies Box Set: Books Kris Calvert. Sharon Hamilton. Susan Stoker. Mary E Thompson. Her Guarded Hero. The Whole Package. Jennifer Ashley. Have Mercy. Dale Mayer. With This Man. Kay Lyons.
Falling For Her Boss. Lead Me Not. Million Dollar Standoff. Crossing The Line. November Their Secret Bargain. October Christmas At Holly Wood. Second Chances. The Crash Before Christmas. Return to Eden. Small Town Scandal. September Their Secret Son. August His Christmas Wish. It Had To Be You. The Nanny's Secret. Hers To Keep. Someone To Trust.